[2025-04-08T06:40:15Z] * kris_ loves caddy
[2025-04-08T07:35:38Z] * sewn is disgusted at kris_
[2025-04-08T07:35:48Z] * sewn used to love caddy but now uses kimchi+tlstunnel
[2025-04-08T08:24:56Z] <il> What's wrong with caddy?
[2025-04-08T09:44:48Z] <sewn> bloat
[2025-04-08T09:44:52Z] <sewn> too much for a simple website
[2025-04-08T10:04:49Z] <sad_plan> just use werc, or smu
[2025-04-08T11:22:31Z] <sewn> that's for static site generation 
[2025-04-08T11:22:36Z] <sewn> we talking serving
[2025-04-08T11:22:57Z] <sewn> and kimchi+tlstunnel is more nix phiolosphy focusrd
[2025-04-08T11:28:32Z] <sad_plan> and we want static sites, do we not? thought caddy also just converted md to html?
[2025-04-08T11:32:33Z] <sewn> do you really want a webserver to do that for yiu
[2025-04-08T11:38:04Z] <sad_plan> why? smu works just fine, so does werc
[2025-04-08T11:38:43Z] <sad_plan> im inclined to belive one can quark and be done for the day, to serve a simple website
[2025-04-08T11:43:58Z] <sewn> sad_plan
[2025-04-08T11:44:06Z] <sewn> smu is a markdown generator
[2025-04-08T11:44:20Z] <sewn> werc is a static site generator
[2025-04-08T11:44:25Z] <sewn> they are not webservers
[2025-04-08T11:44:28Z] <sewn> quark is a webserver
[2025-04-08T11:45:07Z] <sewn> you can use it but do you want something with thousands of features to do something quark or kimchi could do just to serve the website
[2025-04-08T11:47:28Z] <sad_plan> I was refering to caddy. I know smu and werc isnt a webserver.
[2025-04-08T11:47:46Z] <sad_plan> i dont want thousands of features. I just want the bear minimum
[2025-04-08T11:47:51Z] <sad_plan> s/bear/bare/
[2025-04-08T11:48:07Z] <sad_plan> and in this case, I think quark works just fine
[2025-04-08T11:58:30Z] <sewn> sure
[2025-04-08T11:58:33Z] <sewn> but you want https
[2025-04-08T11:58:40Z] <sewn> <sad_plan> i dont want thousands of features. I just want the bear minimum
[2025-04-08T11:58:42Z] <sewn> then don't use caddy
[2025-04-08T11:58:44Z] <sewn> or defend it
[2025-04-08T11:58:45Z] <sewn> lol
[2025-04-08T12:00:15Z] <sad_plan> most likely, yes. seeing as im somewhat of a security advocate aswell, it would be ironic if my website did not serve https at all. people would also shy away from it because modern browsers will alert about it
[2025-04-08T12:00:28Z] <sad_plan> im not defending caddy :p
[2025-04-08T12:00:41Z] <sad_plan> I was meerly suggesting an alternativ. a better one that is
[2025-04-08T12:01:56Z] <sewn> mm
[2025-04-08T16:15:53Z] <vouivre> phoebos: sorry, now I get it. For me the build flags were the flags the user has to use. 
[2025-04-08T16:17:31Z] <vouivre> like you said the build flags are chosen to run on any x86-64 architecture. If the user want to change afterwards, it's something else. 
[2025-04-08T16:18:08Z] <vouivre> next time I have to read and think about it........ it will be better :-)
[2025-04-08T16:18:29Z] <vouivre> thank you for the clarification